![]() |
|
|
|
PROCEEDING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON
EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
AND THE CASE OF CYPRUS MINES
TURKISH REPUBLIC
OF NORTHERN CYPRUS LEFKE GEMIKONAĞI
CMC (CYPRUS MINE
COMPANY) AND ENVIRONMENTAL ELATIONS
Ümİt ERDEM,
Bahar ZAFER,
Bahrİye GÜLGÜN
AND Okan
YILMAZ
Ege University, Bornova, İzmir,
Turkey
ABSTRACT
The mining area in Lefke-Gemi
Konağı, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus where the mining works had been
started by CMC in 1913, produced primarily copper at the beginning and later
secondary products like copper sulfate (CuSO4), hydro sulfuric
acid (H2SO4) and gold was produced by cyanide leaching
method. Unfortunately, these mining processes left the area as a threat for
Eastern Mediterranean after the American company left the region.
The area is classified as a
noticeable coastal ecosystem but sadly the high amounts of arsenic, barium,
cadmium, chromium and selenium in the environment are surprisingly
noticeable in the aspect of human health. When Lefke is examined
historically, agriculture reduced and the soil lost its abundance as soon as
mining started. Even though the mentioned company had promised
re-cultivation and recreation. It didn't keep its promises, so problems
increased and expanded because the pollution in water, air and soil effected
the biodiversity, water-soil balance was effected, apart from agricultural
productions of olive, citrus and carobs, many historical values like Vuni
Palace and ruins of Soli encountered the danger of vanishing.
INTRODUCTION
Copper production processes are
given start by an United States of America (USA) company (CMC company )
since 1913 in the mentioned region. Production of cupper as a primary
product, and the later secondary productions like CuSO4 (Cupper sulfate),
H2SO4 (Hydrosulfuric acid) and gold by cyanide leaching method were the
activities came out to be out of control system which caused ongoing
international wide environmental problems. The company is observed to
abandone the process area under the pretext of Turkish Peace Operation by
1974, beside their prior promises for recultivation . The region is an
important coastal ecosystem. Referring to various research reports declared,
unfortunately arsenic, barium, cadmium, and selenium are found out to be
high in amounts, at the region.
By a comparative consideration of
changes in local peoples life since 1913 when the mine activity is given
start, we find out that as the mine activites have progressed local
agriculture got in regression, production of citrus fruits (as the mayor
one) is decreased likewise the grape production in Baglikoy (4).
Production of cupper, with a
history of 5000 years at the region would be the fate of Cyprus. The region
is in Trodos, Magmatic complex where we see the iron, pyrite and cupper
(calcopyrite), sulfuric gem, in Trodos pads. In this long history, the name
of the island finally took place in the literature after the terms Cyprium,
Cuprum and finally as “Cyprus”. For such a basic reason the locals of the
island do still use the name “Kıprıs” than “Kıbrıs” in Turkish. Thus Cyprus
is also an archeologically cupper ore strata. Sulfuric gem in the region is
in forms of pyrite,calcopyrite,marcasit, sfalarid, galen,bornit, zinc and
sulfur lairs. These lairs often exist at the base or upper parts of the lava
pads in efficient volcanic status.
The sulfur mineralization in the
region is formed by the abilites of thermal loaded fluids (hydrothermal) at
the bottom parts of the ocean. Sources of pollutants that have threatened
the livelihood of soil, vegetation, ground water and sea have been the crude
gem reservoirs - an uncovered one at Lefke, and a covered one at Karadağ
- and chemical wastes, accumulated wastes, wastes of gold process with
cyanide, major wastes of copper flotation plants, waste pools with pyrite
consisting 25-30 % sulfur at Gemikonağı harbour in the region of Karadağ,
south west of Lefke.
In our observations at Gemikonagi
puddle where constructed over Maden Stream as a soil filled dam, we conclude
that iron, sulfur of cupper and “trailings” carried by surface waters will
form acidic environment in drinking and irrigation waters due condensation
of heavy metals (4).
Lefke-Gemikonagi gem plantation is
profoundly operated by CMC since 1913. But after all, the company has
proposed the Turkish Peace Operation as an excuse and abandoned the area in
status of “valley of death” with all the wastes left back by 1974 (Figure
2).
Current condition is a typical
sample for environmental destruction and a deadly strike on ecological
balance. For this reason the area should be taken in consideration in
current status as an open laboratory sample for environmentalists and whom
care for their future life. Referring to our observations on the local
pollution levels after the mine process activities, there we found four
distinctive levels of status from sea level up to mountains. These are;
1. Wastes of gold having the
possibility of consisting in cyanide at the entrance area of Gemikonagi
plantations,
2.
Wastes of cupper flotation at the entrance areas of Gemikonagi
plantations,
3.
Waste pools consisting in condensed pyrite mineral having 30% sulfur
in, separated to uprising 6 branches of waste pools.
4.
Cupper accumulations and also wastes of trailing in apparent streams
at Karadağ region due to mine production extractions.
Figure 1. Location of Cyprus in east
Mediterranean – Location of Lefke in Cyprus
Figure 2 CMC
Gemikonagi Gem Production Plant and Surrounding ( 2).
Analyses covered with water samples
indicate the acid leakage to marine environment in important amounts.
Unfortunately these values given above, exceed the acceptable value levels
of environmental health. There by, a point should be indicated that the
conduction ability of seawater is high due to salinity of seawater. Thus if
water samples could be taken in analyse in fresher form, current values in
hand to be found at higher values would be an aspect of a research.
According to analyse results, iron
element in soils are in high amounts and could be found up to concentrations
of 6.1%. The washed out surface soils and condensation of iron element in
mine plantation could explain the reason of rather high amount of iron
element found in under surface horizons. Distribution of iron in this kind
of soil formation is mainly found to be in between the levels of 2.00-3.50
%. Prior studies covered at mine wastes, the highest datum is valued to be
14.77 %. Cupper to be found in between amounts of 5-150 ppm. is determined
to be very high in amounts in analysed soil thus there is a definite
accumulation of cupper in soil or in another words there is a cupper
pollution.
Dispersion limits of manganese
element in this type of soil should be 200-600 ppm. where it is higher in
inspected soils. Zinc element is found to be slight in amounts in nature
where average value is 50 ppm. but the values could reach up to 300ppm.
Lithosphere dispersal of cadmium element average is 0.1ppm., and could be
0.5 ppm at the upper layer. Although this element is found out to be low in
amounts in the waste accumulations, it is still one of the most risky and
endangering element for human, fauna and flora life. Soils indicate over
value for cobalt referring the analyses of surface soils with 15ppm value.
Average value for lead element in
lithosphere is 16.0 ppm. Calculated values
for iron element at these soil are over this value reaching to level of 45
ppm. at surface soils as a proof for the accumulation of lead. Lead is hold
by the intense organic formations in soil. Likewise in prior research
studies by the same researchers it is encountered that values for lead could
reach up to 82.75 ppm in some of the waste pools.
Crom element likewise lead, became
dense in surface soil as these kind of elements do accumulate in soils of
forest leftovers or humus. Relative to this interaction, values increase up
to 25.90 ppm at surface layers where as decrease down to 1.30 ppm at
undersurface layers. Dispersal of aluminium is found out to be in 1-6 ppm.
lithosphere average levels. Lowest value, 01.8 ppm. for aluminium is found
at undersurface layers. The reason for this low value could be explained due
to the % density of sand set and % CaCO3 reaching up to 35.72ppm. and 35.83
ppm. of high values. We know that amount of aluminium decrease in the
regions where values for limestone is high (1).
Lefke Cupper Mine mud pools are
primitive in structure and threatening for public health. Amount of waste is
in high emission level covering a very wide area. It is determined that the
waste mud, irrigation waters, garden soils, leaves of fruit and vegetable do
consist high amounts of carcinogen heavy metals. The region is contaminated.
There exists a chronic exposure that will cause cancer and /or systemic
diseases for local people whom do inhabit for long terms, consuming the
water, fruit, vegetable, meat and milk of the region (3).
Material and Method
The basic method for determining the
land use decision which is survey, analysis and evaluation been used in this
work. Plan-square and matrix methods are used with some given examples.
Soil and water analyses are
realized in Soil Department Laboratory by Altınbaş, Ü. (1), physical,
chemical and heavy metal analyses completed with these samples within the
principles defined in the nearby presented literature (Slavin, 1968; Merck,
1973; Chen, 1991).
Result and Discussion
Production of gold is a very
popular agenda of the day. There we encounter many companies and firms
planning gold production activities by mining operations. Cyprus aspect is
rather apart of this attitude. The problem in here is that the mine given
start operating by 1913 to be left back in wrong timing, without planning
and consciousness. The problem is derived from the preconditions of those
times, permitting this kind of an activity without any obligation for
environmental assessment. Today it is known in common that there is the fact
of Environmental Effects Assessment put emphasis on at international level.
That is, what we tried to adapt into application though from reverse phase.
It is because that the issue is not solely a Cyprus problem. East
Mediterranean is under a threat. Mediterranean, south of Europe, north
coastlines of Africa are under danger.
Thus;
A) Current status of environmental
conditions should be determined and B) Precautions for probable effects of
the SLEEPING or already AWAKE GIANT should be cleared out. “ Current Status
of Environment Investigation” is an evaluation study of information and
knowledge database for further studies on the subject and the region. The
database will be used for Recultivation and Rehabilitation applications. The
study should cover meteorologic, geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, mine
beds, soil specifications, forest-landscape-recreation- flora fauna of
protected areas, current pollution load, Socio-culture and Socio-economy
data and such kind of specifications. Specialist groups, individuals that
have covered research activities in certain times, gathered and inquired
knowledge on the issue and related literature material are the most
important sources of information for this study.
There should be an alternative
effort to be put on land use potential and protected areas. Such kind of
sample study could be progressed as follows:
The current status of mentioned
area should be determined with the help of the examinations of 1/25.000
scaled area, 1/ 10.000 scaled Cadastral, 1/5.000 and 1/1000 scaled
Gemikonagi project, 1/25.000 scaled topographical maps. Potential of the
field as a protected natural area should be determined as a prior activity.
To define the status of nature protection areas and priorities of
conservation, “Natural Protection Area Assessment Form” (Table1) (6) should
be used for evaluation.
The method used for this aim is
known as the “grid method” used for many kind of aims in Land Scape
Planning. Grids to refer 100m*100m land squares in the boarders of the study
area would be convenient for objectivity in field analyses. Every square as
one unit will be evaluated in itself accordingly to “Natural Protection Area
Assessment Form”. And potential sources determined in per unit could be
valued over (%) percentages to define the conservation priorities.
It is possible that all single
source titles given by “Natural Protection Area Assessment Form” would not
be available in every area. For this reason available sources in the field
would be taken in consideration but the alter stated but non-existing ones
wouldn’t. Criteria’s should be scored to match total “100” point for the
ease of evaluation. As a principle, unavailable source values should be
added to available ones to be valued over score 100 (Table 2).
Field observation outcomes and maps
are important reference guides for studies on the available source potential
of the area. In assessment of hydrological specifications as natural source,
solely the current stream beds are taken in consideration for mayor source
of evaluation and scores of alter specifications should be added on its
score value (Table 3). Table 1.
“Natural Protection Area Assessment Form” ( DP : Evaluation Score EP :
Added Scores ) (6)
Table 2 .“Natural Protection Area
Assessment Form” and for Research Area Specifications “Natural Status
Assessment Criteria’s and Scores” as a sampling (6) (A) NATURAL
RESOURCES
(B) CALTURAL
RESOURCES (25 Points)
(C)
RECREATIONAL RESOURCES (20 Points)
(D)
EDUCATION, INSTRUCTION AND RESEARCH AREAS (10 points)
(D) NEGATIVE
EFFECTS (Discarded out )
Table 3. Scores Representing the
Research Area Priorities of Conservation, as a sampling (6)
The same situation’s distribution
to squares, in a sample area, at Figure 3, is presented. Likewise at
Gemikonagi the same method must be considered for each square unit in
further studies and analyse of all risks.
Biosphere reserves comprehends the
ecosystems of unique populations, areas of spectacular natural values and
ecosystems that are changed or fragmented as samples of land scapes relative
to traditional land use but which do still present the chance for natural
rehabilitation. Biogenetic rezerves are areas where we find a rich gene
diversity of fauna and flora. These areas should be large in dimensions to
be convenient for effective protection. Gemikonagi has the dimensions to be
such an area.
Although criterias of International
Specially Protected Areas are not given in a fullproof definition of law,
they are areas of ecological importance, delicate to environmental
fragmentation and deterioration under the stress and threat of dense
pollution. These areas are boardered and assessed accordingly to carry their
natural and historical heritage to new human generations. That’s why
organizations on world should adopt the subject, in haste. (6)
Beside all, nature or environment
protection areas should occupy fields of traditional landuse samples. Nature
protection areas do have all status of protection where Natural SIT is
among. Areas of natural SIT do have the specifications of being originally
natural ( the level of being anthropogenic affects-free), entire (an
unfragmented habitat), large (entirety of habitat where the natural values
are a part), estetic, typical, representative and other.
Figure 3 Conservation and Progression Priorities Distribution in
Squares, as a sample (6)
Also in many countries, SIT status
is vital for protecting natural areas under the management responsibilities
of local administrations where the area could exist nearby of secondary
house investments and /or intense constructional use. The subject should be
paid attention considering the settlement and location, nearby and far
environment of the area.
Conclusion
In frame of all these ideas and
thoughts, Gemikonagi, Recultivation and Rehabilitation operations should be
given start immediately. The reason for this is, Gemikonagi CMC wastes, to
be concluded as the biggest environmental problem of world, are a prior
issue of law.The subject must be called for attention of international law
committees. Although the issues of Cyprus press are proactivites specific to
Lefke, the subject is an international one. The threat of the issue
comprehends East Mediterranean countries; Turkey, Israel, Egypt, Sudan,
Greece, Italy and Central Mediterranean countries. An important point here
is that, this subject directly affective on human life shouldn’t be handled
or specified by a structural or political attitude. It is determined by
previous research studies covered before the Turkish researcher’s that there
is a very big problem of heavy metals like arsenic, baryum accumulation in
Eastern Mediterranean. Without a “Risk Analyse” there shouldn’t be any
agricultural activity, water consumption, cattle feed and the most
important, entrance to the area (4).
Research studies show that beside
all findings the pollution area is much wider than the declarations. The
waste area declared to cover 2000 acres is determined to be much bigger than
this total. Management of water foundations is a very critical point at this
phase as these waters if not directed properly do carry the wastes to
drinking and all kind of consumed waters and sea. Considering this situation
in the basin, underground and surface waters should be handled
accordingly.As mentioned before, beside the 2000 acres danger area, the
surrounding environment do also present a big threat. According to
Prof.Dr.H.G.BARTH’s determinations
such kind of an area in need of
rehabilitation in Germany, would require a cost of at least 500.000 $ . (4).
It is definite reality that there is a heavy metal pollution of arsenic,
barium, cadmium in Eastern Mediterranean, thus the region should be
rehabilitated as soon as possible. Area, affected from the mine company
activities should be accepted to cover 500
km². In the observations it is determined
that there exists 8 million tons of waste in the area.
If to revise, the problem is a
regional one, concerning the Mediterranean countries. That’s why there is
need for a global approach. The responsibilities for solutions shouldn’t be
devoted solely to Cyprus. Including United States of America,
representatives of related countries should be gathered, in a concerned
council. The council should define the progress, management, and
finalisation procedure of the required processes within scientific and legal
dimensions. The ethic, also requires this cooperation. Not to be forgotten
that the science doesn’t have a nationality and it is universal. And it
could only be possible to achieve realistic and practical solutions by
activating the legal branches. As the nationality of environmental problems
is the whole world, any world individual has got right on this entirety and
for law.
References
1) ALTINBAŞ,Ü.,
1999: "Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti Lefke-Gemikonağı, CMC Bakır Madeni
İşletmeciliğinin Doğal Kaynak Olan Toprak, Su ve Bitki Çeşitliliği Üzerine
Çevresel Etkileri" E.Ü. Çevre Sorunları Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi,
BORNOVA- İZMİR.
2) BILDIR,E., 2000:
"Bakır" Lefke ve Yöresinin Sesi, Çevre ve Tanıtma Derneği Yayın Organı,
Lefke-KIBRIS.
3) DOĞAN,F., 1999:
"Kıbrıs Lefke Bölgesindeki Bakır Madeni Atık Alanlarının Yarattığı Çevre
Sorunları ve Halk Sağlığı İlişkisi" E.Ü. Çevre Sorunları Uygulama Ve
Araştırma Merkezi, BORNOVA- İZMİR.
4)ERDEM,Ü., 1999:
"Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti Lefke-Gemikonağı, CMC Madencilik Şirketi
Tarafından Yaratılan Çevre Sorunu Ön Raporu" E.Ü. Çevre Sorunları Uygulama
Ve Araştırma Merkezi, BORNOVA- İZMİR.
5) ÖZGÜRÜN,A., AKGÜL,E., 2000: Gemikonağı ve Kıbrıs Maden  | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||